Though a seemingly easy question, asking someone to reiterate their thought process can provide insight for both them and the questioner. This insight can be used to reverse engineer problems or even to recognize the patterns that were only picked up on subconsciously before. Prediction can be a powerful tool. It combines knowledge with feeling, creating a hypothesis of sorts. Though you should avoid relying on them exclusively, they do provide a deeper understanding of a current situation because they force you to look ahead.
Intent can differ greatly from delivery, which is why this question can be so informative. What was the plan? Did you stray from it? Did you discover a new train of thought that led you somewhere else? In other words, now that you have this information, what new questions arise? This question is designed to dig deeper into an issue and to encourage the exploration of all of its facets.
Worst-case scenarios can provide a great deal of insight. Though they are powerful tools for vocalizing and naming fears, they are also powerful for realizing that perhaps the fear is less scary than it sounded in your head.
Either way, this type of question demands the person asked to look ahead. Asking someone about a best-case scenario can be just as powerful as its counterpart. If everything goes as planned, what are we hoping to accomplish here? Is it worth it? Every challenge has something that laid the foundation for it. Though this question can be philosophical at times, it can also provide a great deal of insight into what the actual issue is as well as how to address it.
This question is designed to seek and provide perspective. If the situation were reversed, how would you handle it? Probing questions are intended to challenge assumptions and beliefs. More than just to verify the truthfulness of the other party's claims, this question is asking how they reached those conclusions. When approaching situations, it can be easy to focus on either the positive or negative aspects. This inquiry asks the other person to examine and assess both sides.
As we mentioned before, drawing connections is a great way to develop new and creative solutions. However, this question is designed to go a bit further to determine what that connection is and why it exists. In other words, are your competitors facing this challenge? What are you doing differently than them? This question urges the other party to gain perspective and look outside of their situation for insight and answers.
Though we commonly consider the effects of decisions and solutions, it's important to remember to look further than the immediate benefits. Most effects become evident quickly. However, there are situations where the effects may not be as obvious. Are there any impacts that will escape immediate detection? This can relieve the tension of an applicant who might understand that they are not providing the required response. Prompting often follows probing. Prompting questions are usually narrow, leading or closed questions.
Interviewers should be very careful to note the responses to prompting questions as they often provide information to an applicant rather than gain it from the applicant. The interviewer should be careful in how the responses to prompting questions are considered or assessed. It is important to be equitable in using prompting questions to ensure that no applicants gain an unfair advantage during job interviews.
Probing and prompting are two techniques that job interviewers can use to gain more information from the job applicant or to share further information to enable them to perform to the best of their ability. Both approaches should be employed during job interviews in an equitable way. Probing to gain more information during job interviews Often, when asking an applicant questions in a job interview situation, you want or need more information than you get at first.
What measures did you use to determine its level of success? Prompting to help applicants during job interviews Prompting is something quite different from probing. John: "Ten. Teacher: "Then what do we know about the square root of 94? John: "It's between nine and ten. Sam: "It's about an old man's courage in catching a fish. Teacher: "Mary, do you agree? Questions which require the student to recall specific information s he has previously learned.
Often these use who, what, when, where, etc. Questions with no right or wrong answers, but which encourage exploration of possibilities. Requires both concrete and abstract thinking to arrive at an appropriate response.
Questions which require students to figure out answers rather than remember them. Requires generalizations related to facts in meaningful patterns. Ex: "Which of the two books do you believe contributed most to an understanding of the Victorian era? Lee or Ulysses S. Inductive: Discovery of a general principle from a collection of specific facts. Deductive: Logical operation in which the worth of a generalization is tested with specific issues.
Ex: "We have examined the qualities these world leaders have in common. What might we conclude, in general, about qualities necessary for leadership?
Ex: "Is a mussel the same thing as a clam?
0コメント